Process Cooling
  Home
  Subscribe
  eNewsletter
  Online
  Calendar of Events
  Blog
  How To Corner
  Current
  Industry News
  Company News
  Did You Know...
  Online Now
  New Products
  The Glitch & The Fix
  Resources
  AEC Store
  Archives
  Career Center
  e-News Archives
  Industry Links
  Market Research
  Radiant Flooring Guide Directory
  Digital Radiant Flooring Guide
  Radiant Heating Report
  Solar Thermal Report
  R+H Info
  About Us
  Contact Us
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies

One After The Other
by John Siegenthaler, P.E.
July 21, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



The Glitch

Overview: Outdoor reset control of hydronic heat sources reduces operating cost. In some systems, outdoor reset control can vary the supply water temperature all the way from a relatively high design temperature of say 170 or 180 ºF, down to just above room temperature. Although a condensing boiler can be used to supply such a wide temperature range, it will not condense when operating at the upper part of such a temperature range.

One technique that compensates for this is to supply the load with a condensing boiler when the supply water temperature is low, and then invoke a conventional boiler for added capacity as conditions approach design load. This is a less expensive way to add capacity, while recognizing that “non-condensing” conditions don’t justify the added cost of a condensing boiler.

The schematic below shows a system installed with that intent. The mod/con boiler would operate during “shoulder seasons” when supply water temperatures are such that flue gases will condense. The conventional boiler would come online as outdoor temperatures drop and the load increases.

Exercise: Can you find a few things that need changing?


The Fix

The chief issue that needs correction is the series piping of the boilers. Under low load conditions, the mod/con boiler would be operating, and warm water will flow through the distribution system as well as the unfired conventional boiler. The latter is just a source of heat loss to the mechanical room.

Piping the boilers in parallel with individual circulators and check valves solves this issue.

Another issue is the head loss associated with all components in series. While it’s likely that a circulator with sufficient head could be selected, the operating cost will be higher than other options.

The single circulator is also poorly positioned relative to the expansion tank. In this configuration the circulator is “sucking” water through the relatively high resistance of the mod/con boiler.

In the Fix drawing, the expansion tank is near the hydraulic separator. In this configuration all circulators are “pumping away” from the effective point of no pressure change (e.g., the hydraulic separator).

The series circuit with a design load ∆T of 30 ºF is not necessarily a problem provided piping is sized for a modest head loss. The higher ∆T reduced flow rate and hence reduces head loss. The higher ∆T also encourages lower return water temperatures, which enhances condensing mode operation.


John Siegenthaler, P.E.
john@hydronicpros.com
John Siegenthaler, P.E., is principal of Appropriate Designs, a consulting engineering firm in Holland Patent, N.Y., and author of the text “Modern Hydronic Heating.” Visit www.hydronicpros.com for information on new software for hydronic system design and documentation. John is also the contributing editor to PM's monthly "The Glitch & The Fix" column, which offers hydronic troubleshooting solutions in conjuction with the magazine's twice-monthly Radiant & Hydronics eNews newsletter. You can reach John by e-mail at john@hydronicpros.com.

Links

|PrintEmail
  Comments (0)Post a Comment
 

No HTML or BBCode in comments please.
 











BNP Media